KOCHI: The postmortem report of Jisha, a law student in Perumbavoor, said she was strangulated to death. The report also revealed that she was subjected to smothering and strangulation. There were 38 wounds in her body.
There were also some bite marks in her body and it may have occurred during rape attempt. Her private parts were seriously damaged. It may have happened while trying to resist rape.
Law student Jisha was raped before her death: Post-mortem report
PERUMBAVOOR: In the post-mortem conducted on the body of Nisha (29), a law student and Perumbavoor native, who was found dead in her house last week, it has been found that she was brutally raped before her death.
Police said it is a case that could be compared to New Delhi Nirbhaya case. There were about 30 injuries on her body and even the small intestine was visible outside. There were deep wound on her neck caused by knife. In the post mortem report it is also said that the injury in her head had caused her sudden death.
The Forensic expert may again conduct examination of the crime spot.
It was on last Thursday that Nisha, the daughter of Perumbavoor Rayamangalam, Iravichira Vattolippadi Kuttikadu parambil Rajeswari, was found dead in her house, which was located on the Purambokku land (waste land) at Canal bund. She lived along with her mother here. She was found dead first by her mother when she came back home in the night after her daily chores.
On her body there were only churidhar and top.
Nisha was a student of Ernakulam Government Law College. Though she had completed her course, she had to pass a few more exams and was preparing for that. Her father had ditched the family years ago.
Elder sister is with her grandmother in Pulluvazhi.
Police said it is a case that could be compared to New Delhi Nirbhaya case. There were about 30 injuries on her body and even the small intestine was visible outside. There were deep wound on her neck caused by knife. In the post mortem report it is also said that the injury in her head had caused her sudden death.
The Forensic expert may again conduct examination of the crime spot.
It was on last Thursday that Nisha, the daughter of Perumbavoor Rayamangalam, Iravichira Vattolippadi Kuttikadu parambil Rajeswari, was found dead in her house, which was located on the Purambokku land (waste land) at Canal bund. She lived along with her mother here. She was found dead first by her mother when she came back home in the night after her daily chores.
On her body there were only churidhar and top.
Nisha was a student of Ernakulam Government Law College. Though she had completed her course, she had to pass a few more exams and was preparing for that. Her father had ditched the family years ago.
Elder sister is with her grandmother in Pulluvazhi.
Law student Jisha was raped before her death: Post-mortem report
PERUMBAVOOR: In the post-mortem conducted on the body of Nisha (29), a law student and Perumbavoor native, who was found dead in her house last week, it has been found that she was brutally raped before her death.
Police said it is a case that could be compared to New Delhi Nirbhaya case. There were about 30 injuries on her body and even the small intestine was visible outside. There were deep wound on her neck caused by knife. In the post mortem report it is also said that the injury in her head had caused her sudden death.
The Forensic expert may again conduct examination of the crime spot.
It was on last Thursday that Nisha, the daughter of Perumbavoor Rayamangalam, Iravichira Vattolippadi Kuttikadu parambil Rajeswari, was found dead in her house, which was located on the Purambokku land (waste land) at Canal bund. She lived along with her mother here. She was found dead first by her mother when she came back home in the night after her daily chores.
On her body there were only churidhar and top.
Nisha was a student of Ernakulam Government Law College. Though she had completed her course, she had to pass a few more exams and was preparing for that. Her father had ditched the family years ago.
Elder sister is with her grandmother in Pulluvazhi.
Details of cases against Chandy to be informed to court: VS
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Opposition leader V S Achuthanandan has said that he sticks to his statement that there are 31 cases against Chief Minister Oommen Chandy. As these cases are before the court, the details of it will be informed to them and will make sure Oommen Chandy lands in jail, he posted in his Facebook page.
FIR should be registered on complaints by the police and the vigilance. However, both Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala and the vigilance director are delaying it. The people of the state knows that both police and the vigilance have pawned their backbone before the chief minister.
Petty cases are not filed in the Lok Ayuktha. They have recorded 47 cases regarding corruption in their website. This information was obtained through the RTI. But, when it was exposed, a person from the chief minister’s office came down heavily on the Lok Ayuktha.
That retired judge, who got a job via the chief minister claimed that there is no case against him. However, it is my duty to explain the truth if the chief minister misleads the public, he said.
FIR should be registered on complaints by the police and the vigilance. However, both Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala and the vigilance director are delaying it. The people of the state knows that both police and the vigilance have pawned their backbone before the chief minister.
Petty cases are not filed in the Lok Ayuktha. They have recorded 47 cases regarding corruption in their website. This information was obtained through the RTI. But, when it was exposed, a person from the chief minister’s office came down heavily on the Lok Ayuktha.
That retired judge, who got a job via the chief minister claimed that there is no case against him. However, it is my duty to explain the truth if the chief minister misleads the public, he said.
No case against me, says CM again
MALAPPURAM: Chief Minister Oommen Chandy has reiterated that there is no case registered against him. “I have submitted my nomination paper for the Assembly election after making sure that no case exists against me,” he said on Monday.
The chief minister was responding to Lokayukta Justice Pius C Kuriakose’ disapproval over Upalokayukta giving clean chit to ministers including him. He also asked why people who had complaints against him didn’t say it earlier.
The chief minister was responding to Lokayukta Justice Pius C Kuriakose’ disapproval over Upalokayukta giving clean chit to ministers including him. He also asked why people who had complaints against him didn’t say it earlier.
Lok Ayuktha unhappy over giving clean chit to CM
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Lok Ayuktha Justice Pious Kuriakose expressed dissatisfaction on the proceedings of the Upa Lok Ayuktha giving clean chit to the chief minister and other ministers. They gave clean chit saying that presently there are no cases against the chief minister and ministers either in the Lok Ayuktha or in the Upa lok Ayuktha. The Lok Ayuktha said that he was abroad when the news came. Opining on the cases considered by me was inappropriate, he pointed.
Lok Ayuktha made the statement when the case in connection with the re-appointment of the daughter of a KPCC member as against the high court order was considered. As per the reply of the RTI, the state information officer had replied that there 18 cases against the chief minister and 45 against the ministers. The order giving clean chit to the chief minister and ministers was given following a complaint by the chief minister’s private secretary against it.
Neither a declaration was submitted under section 14 nor an order for trial was given under section 15 in any of the cases.
Lok Ayuktha made the statement when the case in connection with the re-appointment of the daughter of a KPCC member as against the high court order was considered. As per the reply of the RTI, the state information officer had replied that there 18 cases against the chief minister and 45 against the ministers. The order giving clean chit to the chief minister and ministers was given following a complaint by the chief minister’s private secretary against it.
Neither a declaration was submitted under section 14 nor an order for trial was given under section 15 in any of the cases.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)